The Basic Principles Of separate corporate identity pakistan case law
The Basic Principles Of separate corporate identity pakistan case law
Blog Article
Since the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is achieved, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a good amount of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the discovered counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession on the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to become decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this component for interim custody of the subject premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
The ruling with the first court created case law that must be followed by other courts until eventually or Until possibly new regulation is created, or a higher court rules differently.
This is because transfer orders are typically considered within the administrative discretion from the employer. However, there may very well be exceptions in cases where the transfer is determined by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They could have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more
When there is no prohibition against referring to case regulation from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds minimal sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent in the home state, relevant case legislation from another state may be viewed as by the court.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the load specified to any reported judgment might count on the reputation of both the reporter along with the judges.[7]
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it is unclear the way it applies to any provided situation, usually rendering judgments based about the intent of lawmakers as well as the circumstances in the case at hand. This kind of decisions become a guide for long term similar cases.
10. Without touching the merits of your case on the issue of annual increases while in the pensionary emoluments with the petitioner, in terms of policy decision on the provincial government, these types of annual increase, if permissible while in the case of employees of KMC, involves further assessment to generally be made with the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance because of funding issues and insufficient adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives in the police would be to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, ensure law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair for the offender plus the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic criminal law cases in pakistan of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The legislation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair to the offender plus the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The loads of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
ten. Based over the findings of the inquiry committee, this petition is not regarded as maintainable and is particularly therefore liable to get dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
eight. For your reasons stated earlier mentioned, this court finds the petition to get without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend during the comments, and their request is Consequently acceded to. All pending applications, if any, may also be dismissed. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners may possibly look for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more